What does the Rambam mean in MT Hilchot M'lachim 5:9
That:
«Even though it was a famine and one is permitted to leave Israel [nevertheless] "Einaah middat Hassidut" ...
And because of that Machalon and Kilyon - 2 "gdolei hador" ..left and were liable to destruction by "the Maqom"»
Questions:
1. If it's Halachically permitted to leave, then who cares about "Middat Hassidut"?
2 How does being a "Gadol Hador" change their liability or obligation? Aren't ALL Jews on the same level of obligation and liability?
3. Why did the Rambam say they were punished - when even he concedes that they actually acted within the parameters of Halachah?
4. In Lech L'cha, Avraham Avinu left The Holy Land under similar circumstances - and he apparently was rewarded and NOT punished! How does this Rambam address that case?
For further sources
See Torah Temimah on Lech L'cha 12:10 quoting
Bava Qama 60b
And Note 13 quoting
Bava Batra 91a
And the aforementioned Rambam Mishneh Torah M'lachim 5:9
Shalom
RRW
No comments:
Post a Comment