I have opposed ad hominem attacks in general - and so this aspect of R Hirsch's wrtitings bothers me
On The Other Hand, R Hirsch was locked in a battle for men's souls
It was ET LA'ASOT.
What was the short-term and long-term danger of Graetz's writings? What really bothered R Hirsch? Was Hirsch angry at Graetz's errors? Many writers make mistakes....
What WAS the key objection?
I have my own theories, what do you Reader's say
Maybe we can conduct a poll.
Shalom
RRW
No comments:
Post a Comment