Sunday, 8 August 2010

Statement of Principles on the Place of Jews with a Homosexual Orientation in Our Community

As a signatory of the above Statement (see http://statementofprinciplesnya.blogspot.com/), while I may have phrased some points a bit differently, I understood its value, importance and significance. There is a need to set a policy as to how our community should relate to individuals with an attraction to the same sex, especially as many of them attempt to observe the strictures of Halacha in this regard. It is doubly important given the false perceptions in the general society, from such items as the movie Trembling Before G-d (see my reviews at http://www.nishma.org/articles/commentary/commentaryindex.html), about the Torah standards in this regard. While maintaining without question our allegiance to Halacha, a statement reflecting our understanding of the challenge faced by homosexual individuals and the requirement to relate to them within this context had to be articulated. It is for these reasons that I signed the Statement.

Sadly, though, the Statement was still hijacked by various elements to express a position that the signatories did not intend and which could upset the whole endeavour. The San Francisco Sentinel declared U.S. ORTHODOX RABBIS: ACCEPT HOMOSEXUALS supposedly developing their article based on a presentation from Ynetnews.com. While this article does not really relay any falsehood directly, it does give the impression that the Statement was more liberal than the signatories obviously intended. In fear of further being misrepresented in the future, the result of an article such as this one will be that Orthodox rabbis will be more reluctant to sign such documents as this Statement. I can only really speak for myself but I find myself -- and while this was not the first time I encountered this although I clearly did not expect it in this case -- becoming more and more concerned that any demonstration of empathy will be hijacked to reflect a view which I clearly do not maintain. The result will be to be more cautious before stating any opinion of empathy -- to the detriment of those who need this empathy. Hijacking a statement such as the one made by this group of Orthodox rabbis, while it may seem to be motivated by care for homosexuals, ultimately reflects a lack of care for this group of individuals as it basically gives a message that if you try to reflect empathy while not adopting the complete agenda of the gay community, we will sabotage your caring intention.

Rabbi Ben Hecht

2 comments:

Garnel Ironheart said...

Here's the reason signing on to the statement was a bad idea: hijacking was not only regretably but inevitable.
Now, having signed on you can be targetted further: exactly how accepting are you? Why can't you change halacha to allow their lifestyle? If you're really so tolerant, why do you have red lines?
Remember what happened a few days ago in Toronto where one mayoral candidate was asked about his views on traditional marriage. He responded that while he favours the man-woman definition, what any two people want to do is their business and he isn't going to stop them. His gay opponent then started screeching about how this candidate was "homophobic". Why? Because a statement of tolerance will inevitably lead to a demand for another of acceptance and putting up the red line at that point will leave you as tarred with the homophobia label as not signing on to this in the first place.

Rabbi Ben Hecht said...

The sad fact is that there are individuals who could benefit from such expressions of halachic tolerance who will now further suffer from this need to be concernend that statements such as this one will be hijacked. My reason for signing this statement was because I know of individuals who are attracted to the same sex who, nonetheless, are attempting to live a Torah life and they need not only my support but the support of the whole community. Through the hijacking of this statement my ability to help them, the ability of the community to express compassion for their struggle, is curtailed. It is the sadness of the imposed lonliness of their struggle that bothers me the most.

Rabbi Ben Hecht