The point of departure between the TT's approach and mine is simply this -
The TT's premise is that any Navon [must have] had all the rest of the middot, too.
I'm questioning that way of thinking and saying "lav davka"
One can be a navon and still be lacking other traits
EG In baseball.
Just because a guy hits for average does not prove he hits for power; or vice versa!
Re: Shoftim
Just because X is a lamdan does not mean he's upright
And Vice Versa
Just because Y is upright does not mean he's a lamdan
Therefore the failure to appoint N'vonim does not PROVE that none existed, rather it may be that they DID exist but none of them otherwise qualified.
Shalom,
RRW
No comments:
Post a Comment